Press Release: Allied Pro-Housing Nonprofits File Housing Element Lawsuits Against Cities and Counties Across the Bay Area

Contacts:

Californians for Homeownership: Matt Gelfand, matt@caforhomes.org, 213-739-8206

California Housing Defense Fund (CalHDF): Greg Magofña, greg@calhdf.org, 510-545-3994

YIMBY Law: Jae Garner

Bay Area, CA—In response to the widespread failure by Bay Area cities and counties to meet the January 31 deadline for adopting their sixth cycle housing element updates, three California pro-housing legal nonprofits are announcing an effort to sue cities across the region. 

As of Friday, February 3, 2023, Californians for Homeownership, California Housing Defense Fund, and YIMBY Law had filed 12 lawsuits in Contra Costa, Santa Clara, Marin, and San Mateo County Superior Courts with the intention to file more in the coming weeks. The cities and counties sued include: Belvedere, Burlingame, Cupertino, Daly City, Fairfax, Martinez, Novato, Palo Alto, Pinole, Pleasant Hill, Richmond, and Santa Clara County. Each municipality has been sued by one or two of the non-profits.

“There’s no excuse for these cities to be in violation of state law,” says Sonja Trauss, YIMBY Law Executive Director. “Cities have had years to plan for this. They’ve also received resources and feedback from us, our volunteer watchdogs, and HCD. These cities are trying to push the responsibility onto other communities and avoid having to welcome new neighbors. It’s time for them to be held accountable.“

With the Bay Area’s 109 cities and counties at widely varied stages in the process of Housing Element adoption and compliance, these twelve lawsuits mark the first round of what will likely be many rounds of judicial review for noncompliance with state housing law in the Bay Area. The initial lawsuits focus on cities with a long history of exclusionary housing practices, cities that adopted housing elements unlawfully, and localities that have made little progress in developing their draft housing elements. The organizations will continue to file suits in the coming weeks, prioritizing cities with the most egregious violations in each organization’s judgment.

“It is unacceptable that most Bay Area cities have failed to come up with plans to address the ongoing housing crises,” adds CalHDF Executive Director Dylan Casey. “We cannot begin to fix our housing problems when local governments respond to clear state directives by dragging their feet and looking for loopholes to avoid their responsibilities to provide needed housing growth. We hope these lawsuits will help get cities back on track.”

Among other remedies, the lawsuits seek to establish that these cities and counties are subject to the “builder’s remedy,” a provision in the state’s Housing Accountability Act that exempts mixed- and moderate-income projects from local development standards.  These standards have historically made it difficult to build housing developments—especially those that include housing for lower-income households.

“These new lawsuits build on our work to enforce housing element law in Southern California, where we filed lawsuits against nine cities starting in April 2022,” said Matthew Gelfand, Counsel at Californians for Homeownership. “The Bay Area’s cities and counties had over fifteen months longer to develop housing elements, and many started their process over a year ago.  But they let the process get bogged down as the deadline approached, often as the result of opposition by anti-housing activists. These lawsuits will help ensure that these cities and counties face appropriate consequences.

With overlapping missions to enforce state law, the organizations announcing their housing element lawsuits include three California housing advocacy nonprofits—Californians for Homeownership, the California Housing Defense Fund (CalHDF), and YIMBY Law—with a common interest in ending the Bay Area housing shortage. 

Copies of the filed petitions for writ of mandate are available.

About:

Californians for Homeownership is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that works to address California’s housing crisis through impact litigation to support access to housing for families at all income levels.  The organization was founded by and receives financial and operational support from the California Association of REALTORS®.

Formerly the California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund, the California Housing Defense Fund is a 510(c)(3) nonprofit with a core mission to make lasting impacts to improve the affordability and accessibility of housing to current and future Californians, especially low- and moderate-income people and communities of color.


YIMBY Law’s mission is to end the housing shortage and achieve affordable, sustainable, and equitable housing for all. YIMBY Law is the legal arm of the pro-housing movement and is housed in YIMBY Action’s 501c3 affiliate, Yes In My Back Yard. YIMBY Law leads grassroots oversight and takes legal action so that housing laws are followed, more homes are built, and housing becomes affordable and equitable.

Press Release: YIMBY Law Files Suit Over Systemic Pattern of Illegal Delay in San Francisco Housing Projects

Contact: Jae Garner

San Francisco, CA— YIMBY Law has refiled two lawsuits against San Francisco after finding additional evidence demonstrating a pattern of behavior wherein the city delays housing projects beyond timelines outlined by state law. The lawsuits argue that this behavior from the city perpetuates the housing shortage and affordability crisis in San Francisco.

“San Francisco must be held accountable for these illegal, costly delays, ” said Rafa Sonnenfeld, policy director at YIMBY Law. “It’s well past time for San Francisco to comply with the law and meaningfully address the housing shortage and affordability crisis which are keeping people from being housed.”

YIMBY Law filed two lawsuits against the city of San Francisco between December 2021 and January 2022. Each lawsuit alleged that the city illegally denied a housing project, one at 450 O’Farrell Street and one at 469 Stevenson Street. YIMBY Law has since won a demurrer hearing in the O’Farrell case.

Since filing these cases, YIMBY Law has identified additional city behavior that strengthens pattern and practice claims included in each original filing. These claims argue that San Francisco systemically delays housing projects at multiple stages during the permitting process, extending time frames for review and approval well beyond legal limits outlined by state laws such as the Housing Accountability Act.

YIMBY Law will move forward with the pattern and practice claim included in both cases, in addition to the existing challenge against the denial of a housing project at 450 O’Farrell Street.

“These systemic delays are costly and dangerous for people who face housing insecurity and homelessness in the city,” said Sonja Trauss, Executive Director of YIMBY Law. “We have to speed up the process of approving and building housing until everyone has a stable, affordable home.”

Press Release: YIMBY Law Lawsuit Results in the City of Burbank Approving 92 New Homes

Contact: Jae Garner

Burbank, CA— Following a lawsuit from YIMBY Law, the City of Burbank agreed to approve the Pickwick Project that will convert a parking lot and a bowling alley into 92 new homes. In a meeting held on October 25th, city officials finally approved the SB 35-compliant project.

“We’re glad to see these homes come to Burbank,” said Rafa Sonnenfeld, director of legal advocacy at YIMBY Law. “After months of needless delay, the city came to its senses and approved a slightly modified version of the project. We’re looking forward to seeing these homes be built soon and happy to not be wasting more time arguing in court about the application of SB 35.”

YIMBY Law filed a lawsuit against the City of Burbank on June 21, 2022, for illegally blocking the Pickwick Project. According to the lawsuit, the City Council’s decision was at odds with state law SB 35 which streamlines the approval process for new homes when a city is not on track to meet state-mandated housing goals.

At the time, the City’s Planning Commission as well as the California Department of Housing and Community Development found that the project qualified under SB 35. Despite these findings, the city denied the project and YIMBY Law stepped in.

The city approved a modified version of the original project on October 25th, reducing the number of homes from 96 to 92 without decreasing the total residential square footage, and adding an equestrian trail and other pedestrian and equestrian safety

measures. Measures to mitigate the impacts of construction on surrounding residents will also be put in place.

This lawsuit is one of several filed in 2022 by YIMBY Law to hold jurisdictions accountable for the implementation of SB 35 as well as other California state housing laws. YIMBY Law will continue to monitor city behavior as it relates to housing to ensure local jurisdictions plan for and approve the minimum number of homes required by the state.

“Burbank has blocked hundreds of homes from being built over the years,” said Sonja Trauss, Executive Director of YIMBY Law. “This project is one important step toward making sure Burbank has enough homes for the people who live and work in the community.”